Up Owners Club banner

1 - 13 of 13 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
35 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Just my 90ps tsi mapped to 135hp, and 250nm torque. Car is a completely different animal now, so rapid! A proper sleeper now..
When driving hard, MPG has gone down to 25mpg from the 30s, but driving normally there's no difference.
I've heard the 5 speed box is only rated to 200nm torque though.. Hopefully won't run into any problems in the long term :oops:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
272 Posts
Similar to ours:)
It's a fun car for sure and in a little dice with a GTI UP, exiting a few roundabouts on a dual carriageway, it was significantly quicker.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
272 Posts
I like the sleeper look:) no one apart from a true petrol head, who could be bothered to stick their heads under the wheel arches would have a clue what it is.
I'll insult/upset a few now, but the UP GTI just isn't special enough to warrant the badge or the bling
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,430 Posts
I like the sleeper look:) no one apart from a true petrol head, who could be bothered to stick their heads under the wheel arches would have a clue what it is.
I'll insult/upset a few now, but the UP GTI just isn't special enough to warrant the badge or the bling
Don't upset me, after owning one i totally agree.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
272 Posts
Don't upset me, after owning one i totally agree.
I like the UP, ours is a fun point and squirt, reasonably practical, cheap to run car. For our needs its pretty good (its done 24k miles since I got it, of which I've accounted for maybe less than 7k. So you sort of get it's use/purpose) But it's got no depth of quality or sophistication in it's under pinnings. Beam rear axle, low cost components....
Having said that the ride / handling compromise is surprisingly good. But anyone who thinks it's more than a good city car is deluded:) and no amount of lipstick or bling will alter that.
I'm sure there's literally pretty much zero comparison in this respect to your MX5. In depth quality and development wrt driver engagement.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1 Posts
Just my 90ps tsi mapped to 135hp, and 250nm torque. Car is a completely different animal now, so rapid! A proper sleeper now..
When driving hard, MPG has gone down to 25mpg from the 30s, but driving normally there's no difference.
I've heard the 5 speed box is only rated to 200nm torque though.. Hopefully won't run into any problems in the long term :oops:
Hi,

I have a 90ps 3 door high up. It looks very run of the mill but has some get up and go already. Some extra poke would be great fun. Where did you have yours remapped? Thanks in advance for your help. 👍
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,430 Posts
I like the UP, ours is a fun point and squirt, reasonably practical, cheap to run car. For our needs its pretty good (its done 24k miles since I got it, of which I've accounted for maybe less than 7k. So you sort of get it's use/purpose) But it's got no depth of quality or sophistication in it's under pinnings. Beam rear axle, low cost components....
Having said that the ride / handling compromise is surprisingly good. But anyone who thinks it's more than a good city car is deluded:) and no amount of lipstick or bling will alter that.
I'm sure there's literally pretty much zero comparison in this respect to your MX5. In depth quality and development wrt driver engagement.
You're not wrong but then you're talking about a car that was developed as a sports car from the outset (and is twice the price) whereas the GTI is Vw trying to put lipstick on a pig so to speak, it's fine but no sports car and suffers for the suspension set-up badly on the GTI. Was the reason i sold it after it started "twerking" down a quick back road in France where every other car just carries on through.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
272 Posts
You're not wrong but then you're talking about a car that was developed as a sports car from the outset (and is twice the price) whereas the GTI is Vw trying to put lipstick on a pig so to speak, it's fine but no sports car and suffers for the suspension set-up badly on the GTI. Was the reason i sold it after it started "twerking" down a quick back road in France where every other car just carries on through.
Yes, an unfair comparison:) it was in the context that VW have cynically devalued the GTI brand. It's all about the money of course! and UK buyers are known suckers for this.
The Golf GTI/Golf R are based on a humble hatch but they do have real depth of quality, development and sophistication. At a cost, but a justified cost. Apart from the Mk 3 and 4 GTI the Golfs justify the badge.
The TSI does what it says on the tin, plus a little bit more.
The GTI.....well it doesn't:)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,430 Posts
Yes, an unfair comparison:) it was in the context that VW have cynically devalued the GTI brand. It's all about the money of course! and UK buyers are known suckers for this.
The Golf GTI/Golf R are based on a humble hatch but they do have real depth of quality, development and sophistication. At a cost, but a justified cost. Apart from the Mk 3 and 4 GTI the Golfs justify the badge.
The TSI does what it says on the tin, plus a little bit more.
The GTI.....well it doesn't:)
Absolutely. When i sold my Gti i said i'd never own one again as it's a compromised city car and a compromised drivers car (needs to make its mind up and ditch the big wheels), however i would have a TSI for a daily car no problem. They just seem to be right for some reason and if you can map them to that kind of grunt then great.

Also as a side note when you look under the latest MX5 you realise just how well developed they are, crazy amount of engineering for the price.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
58 Posts
Also as a side note when you look under the latest MX5 you realise just how well developed they are, crazy amount of engineering for the price.
I have previously owned a Mazda 6 and currently own a Mazda 2. They are great drivers cars but they have one huge problem; the paint work is not fit for purpose. The front bumper, wings, bonnet and even roof pick up stonechips in their dozens very easily. The paintwork also scratches easily if you no more than look it. Mazda has not addressed this issue and refuses to do so. I would never buy another Mazda for this reason. I hope you get on better than i have with your car (I never speed or tailgate!).
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,430 Posts
I have previously owned a Mazda 6 and currently own a Mazda 2. They are great drivers cars but they have one huge problem; the paint work is not fit for purpose. The front bumper, wings, bonnet and even roof pick up stonechips in their dozens very easily. The paintwork also scratches easily if you no more than look it. Mazda has not addressed this issue and refuses to do so. I would never buy another Mazda for this reason. I hope you get on better than i have with your car (I never speed or tailgate!).
Nope, not really, it's still pretty thin but i put that down to an MX5 thing and their quest for lightness.
 
1 - 13 of 13 Posts
Top